Case 1:

Venue: Minnesota - Federal

Subject: Negotiable instruments

Case number: 24-CV-100-SRN-DTS

Brief overview:
I was brought in on a real estate deal with multiple properties that was headed south. Upon investigation into the various contracts and documents, I noticed that several of the documents were unclaimed negotiable instruments that were released by all parties using a blank indorsement. I rapidly moved in and claimed those securities and commanded the real estate broker to have those collateral securities exchanged for Federal Reserve Notes in accordance with 12 USC 412. These orders were directly denied, thus causing our first lawsuit. This is also the first lawsuit where I met Joey Kimbrough and, without his help, this lawsuit would probably not have happened.

We are attempting to actually still do the original deal and pay everyone their commissions, as originally agreed. What is lacking is proper funding. This problem can be easily solved by simply following 12 USC 412.

Mailing, civil cover sheet, summons and complaint:
CLICK HERE TO VIEW THE PDF IN A SHARED DROPBOX FOLDER (will open in a new window)

Personal remarks:
I’ll be frank with you, a lot of this is all new for me. I’m trying my best and not sure what will happen. But I’ll tell you this, these first few cases might be tough but we WILL straighten this whole thing out and learn what is needed to have success as pro se/sui juris litigants. As you can see in the complaint, I made it very simple and left the emotion out of it. Keep in mind that an “allegation” is defined as “setting forth that of which YOU INTEND TO PROVE.” So I’m not attaching 100 pages of bullshit. Honestly, I felt like the complaint was too long even at a little over 9 pages. The complaint is just the allegations… you don’t need to substantiate those allegations until later (such as in discovery). You can see that I placed the ens legis names as the plaintiff and then mentioned how they are, essentially, presented by upper and lower case names. Keep in mind, as the plaintiff, you MUST grant jurisdiction to the court. So I made that delineation between the ens legis and the man/woman very low-key. There is no reason to be loud and obnoxious about these various persons, but we all know it’s important to separate them out. You can see I did not use a lot of big words, did not list endless laws, and did not intend on crushing or squashing anyone. Keep in mind, we are attempting to actually get this original deal back on the rails and actually close this deal and PAY ALL THE ORIGINAL COMMISSIONS AND FULLY ADHERE TO ALL THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENTS. We aren’t walking into the courtroom as psychotic, PCP snorting pieces of shit. I really want you guys to see how light, gentle, clear and simple this can be.